Some Web Analytics Advice

Network Computing has published a series of readers anecdotes relating to web analytics in which there are many interesting pearls of wisdom for web managers who like digging into statistics to grasp how visitors use their web sites.

On the difficulties of working with the IT department:

I'm in marketing, not IT, so IT operations are not an issue at all. We choose to drive our Web analytics platform from our marketing group, as IT all too often emerged as a bottleneck. [Matt Belkin, Macromedia]

Having marketing and IT agree on one solution is as likely as pigs flying! [Jerome Coste, Pittsburgh]

On the fibs of ASP vendors in the Web Analytics field:

We can track anything. [Matt Belkin, Macromedia]

Using our solution is a simple 30-minute process, just insert some JavaScript on your pages, and you will instantly have full Web site tracking capabilities managed by us. [Marcus Chung, Sygate Technologies]

On what to expect from those tools:

Web analytics is a behavior tool. It's important to understand that. It can tell you what users are doing, but not why they are doing it. That is why we complement our Web analytics work with attitudinal customer data. [Matt Belkin, Macromedia]

On Log Files Analysers vs. Web Beacons ASP services:

Disk space. Our Web Trends fills a 200-GB RAID with every file NTFS compressed. The logs are only a smal part of the space. [Bill Royds, Ottawa]

We've saved a ton of money by using a hosted ASP (Omniture) and continually benefit from their industry-leading expertise. I loathe the days of having in-house data centers; the maintenance alone was a killer. [Matt Belkin, Macromedia]

I've been using all sorts of web analytics methods and, by experience, can back up pretty much everything that they say in this article. IMO, the best method available today is using a web beacon technology (a small tag embedded into HTML pages, Flash files, whatever can reach a browser and execute a javascript code) either hosted as an ASP service (I've used four different ones as of today) or in-house through something like phpOpenTracker. This is of course not something reasonable for tracking your personal weblog, but once your start having some significant traffic and get serious about understanding how people use your site, this method is way more efficient, accurate and actually cheaper than most of the log analysis packages out there.

Speaking of which, when needs, budget or pointy-haired bosses do not allow for web beacons, there are a few good log analyzers out there. I personally haven't found anything in the "free" range that is satisfying (advices welcome), so I've been using lately commercial products such as Urchin (pros: work with all "modern" browsers not just Win IE, has some sort of web beacon feature to combine best of both worlds; cons: can get expensive, limited "out of the box" reports) and Summary (pros: extensive set of reports, very fast and resource-efficient on server, one of the best "bang for the bugs" out there; cons: not easy to configure, confusing docs, interface not very user-friendly for marketing folks).

The moral of the story (executive summary) is that:

  • respective to the site audience and goals of course, web beacons are often comparatively better than log analysis, mainly in terms of possibilities, accuracy and costs

  • web analytics are behavioral (how they use your site), it does not read the mind of your audience (e.g. WTF are they doing this? ;-) ).

  • you will need to invest a significant amount of time making the most out of those tools, they help but the comprehension of your web site and its audience(s) will not come automagically from a computer

  • web analytics (and to me the whole web operation) is not the IT department's business -- and you can trust me on this one!


It's important to clarify here that the people cited, like Matt Belkin of Macromedia, aren't *themselves* saying these things. These are things they have heard from vendors.

This may not be evident to someone reading this page where quotations appear to be directly attributed to the names following them.

It would be more accurate to say: "Matt Belkin says he's heard this from vendors: etc.etc"

It happens that Matt Belkin and I are using the same tool to measure our respective corporate site, and although I don't know him personally, by reading his contributions on a private forum on web analytics I know for a fact that he's not repeating what a vendor says. This guy knows what he's talking about, there is no doubt about that. Therefore, I completely disagree with your judgment call.

[Plus I find it mean to spit on someone anonymously]

Thanks for the overview. I didn't realise those beacon programs could be so useful. Another very good log analysis tool (and much less expensive) is 123loganalyzer.

There are server-side editions, Windows editions, Mac OS X editions and editions for almost every flavour of Unix.

I'm using it on a small scale to download current logs analyse stuff locally whenever I see an interesting blip in webaliser (built-in). Fast as lightning.

mensuelles Archives

Recent Entries

  • Steve Jobs

    "Remembering that I’ll be dead soon is the most important tool I’ve ever encountered to help me make the big choices in life. Because...

  • Your privacy on MOTOBLUR by Motorola

    After the Nokia Ovi Store carelessness, it's now Motorola who's allowing strangers to get access to your private information on their MOTOBLUR portal. Exactly like...

  • How to resume a broken ADC download

    (I'm documenting this trick for myself to remember, but it can be useful for others…) Apple, on its Apple Developer Connection site, has a bad...

  • WTF is this ‘myEventWatcherDiv’ doing in my web?

    All of a sudden I started to find the following line in most of the web pages I was browsing, including ones I made where...

  • Your privacy on Nokia Ovi Store

    My friend Adam Greenfield recently complained about the over-engineering culture at Nokia: I was given an NFC phone, and told to tap it against the...